Going down for the third time
As the 100th anniversary of the First World War approaches, let’s remember that Empire was the root of Britain’s industrial decline.
After two wars and four decades of torpor, Britain has finally woken up to the idea that most of its industries now face oblivion. Assessing recent books on the problem, this essay explains why graphic designers, at least, have nothing to worry about.
The literature of Britain’s industrial decline is now so long, so voluminous, that most of today’s articles open with an attempt to find a still earlier nineteenth-century symptom of, or official report on it. The story is always the same: we are a nation incapable of taking matters of Production and Design atoll seriously. The latest version is The audit of war, by Corelli Barnett (Macmillan, £14.95).
Mr Barnett’s innovation has been to cast the Second World War as the high tide of Britain’s anti-industrial culture. The choice of this period is an excellent one, for there can be no doubt that the total industrial mobilisation which spanned the years 1939-45 is the formative experience of the twentieth century, for Britain as for many other countries. However, Barnett’s audit of the Second World War is itself wanting. The archival material here trawled is wonderful, and there are some telling passages. But the overall account is partial and so, in my view, are most of the past few years’ contributions on Britain’s decline.
For Barnett, Gordon Russell, founder of today’s Design Council, was a ‘cottagey’ kind of furniture designer, one symptom among many of Britain’s lack of a ‘coherent corporate strategy’. For. the American academic Martin Wiener, in his English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit 1850-1980 (Penguin, £3.95), William Morris was, as he is for Stephen Bayley, a cipher for British fascination with rural values at the expense of machine-based ones. Anyway, you picks your designer as target, according to your preferred period.
Why has Barnett’s book been the subject of a minor furore? He has published at a useful moment. Recent events – the Sikorski/Westland affair, the General Motors/BL affair – have renewed public interest in the politics of production and design. Through his book, Barnett has put in an eloquent plea for more dirigiste state intervention in these areas. There is here a clear nod to Michael HeseItine’s call for a ‘Super-Department of Industry’, one which can for the first time begin to rivaI the Treasury in terms of clout.
Barnett has contributed to the New Statesman before now, so there is also a Kinnockish ‘Party of Production’ air to what he writes. Yet the following targets are singled out for a hatred which Neil Kinnock cannot match: the middle classes; the public schools and Oxbridge; the working class, and the welfare state.
Barnett hates William Beveridge. He, like John Logie Baird, was cranky, idealistic: ‘not one of the leading New Jerusalemers was an engineer, an industrialist or a trade unionist,’ says Barnett, dolefully, though I am not sure he is any of those three himself. But be certain of this: the Spitfire might have been a better plane than the Messerschmitt, but that was only because the Americans, through Lend Lease, financed its exorbitant production costs (airframes at 13,000 man-hours each, as against 4000 for Messerschmitts); and because it was designed to win wars.
Details in this Sunday Times article are extraordinary but unsurprising: Seems the PUBLIC are seen as a problematic threat to be managed/manipulated. Surely CPS impartiality is compromised by this decision? Read on...
1.6GW total from wind and solar this morning, from a total of ~45GW installed capacity. We're keeping the lights on by burning trees and gas. Nukes and reliance upon interconnectors making up the difference. No chance we can hit Net Zero grid by 2030.
“Mother Nature is in charge, and so we must make sure we adjust”.
Ex-cop Democratic Party mayor, indicted on federal bribery and corruption charges, supported by Trump and critical of antisemitism, tells people to tighten their... throats.
What a mess! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/02/new-york-water-shortage?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Articles grouped by Tag
Bookmarks
Innovators I like
Robert Furchgott – discovered that nitric oxide transmits signals within the human body
Barry Marshall – showed that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori is the cause of most peptic ulcers, reversing decades of medical doctrine holding that ulcers were caused by stress, spicy foods, and too much acid
N Joseph Woodland – co-inventor of the barcode
Jocelyn Bell Burnell – she discovered the first radio pulsars
John Tyndall – the man who worked out why the sky was blue
Rosalind Franklin co-discovered the structure of DNA, with Crick and Watson
Rosalyn Sussman Yallow – development of radioimmunoassay (RIA), a method of quantifying minute amounts of biological substances in the body
Jonas Salk – discovery and development of the first successful polio vaccine
John Waterlow – discovered that lack of body potassium causes altitude sickness. First experiment: on himself
Werner Forssmann – the first man to insert a catheter into a human heart: his own
Bruce Bayer – scientist with Kodak whose invention of a colour filter array enabled digital imaging sensors to capture colour
Yuri Gagarin – first man in space. My piece of fandom: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/10421
Sir Godfrey Hounsfield – inventor, with Robert Ledley, of the CAT scanner
Martin Cooper – inventor of the mobile phone
George Devol – 'father of robotics’ who helped to revolutionise carmaking
Thomas Tuohy – Windscale manager who doused the flames of the 1957 fire
Eugene Polley – TV remote controls
0 comments